ONLINE FIRST
published on March 9, 2025
Catherine Peters
https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc202536165
¡°Necessary¡± and ¡°Possible¡± as Metaphysical Preambles
A Defense of Avicenna against Averroes
When considering the metaphysical preambles to faith, the existence of God is surely preeminent. While investigation of preambles is often a feature of the generally Christian and particularly Catholic entr¨¦e to theology, they also concern the other Abrahamic religions. The present study explores ¡°necessary¡± and ¡°possible¡± as metaphysical preambles in the thought of Avicenna. Though compelling, Avicenna¡¯s account has not escaped criticism, most notably from Averroes, who rejected both these concepts and Avicenna¡¯s subsequent argument for God, the Necessary Existent. Rejecting ¡°necessary¡± and ¡°possible¡± as metaphysical preambles can have far-reaching consequences, not only for the cogency of Avicennian metaphysics, but for any natural theology that seeks to employ these concepts. The present study, first, defends ¡°necessary¡± and ¡°possible¡± as formulated in the metaphysics of Avicenna. Second, it shows how these concepts serve as preambles to arguments for God. Third, it addresses and refutes Averroes¡¯ criticisms.