ONLINE FIRST
published on March 5, 2022
Deborah Eicher-Catt
https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs20223475
Peirce, Dewey, and the Aesthetics of Semioethics
Felt Qualities, Embodied Intensities, and the Precarity of Relational Fulfillment
This essay interrogates the aesthetic ground of Ponzio and Petrilli¡¯s 2003 concept ¡°semioethics¡± as activated by what they call a ¡°logic of otherness¡±. I take my lead from Charles S. Peirce¡¯s assertion that ¡°Ethics, or the science of right and wrong, must appeal to Esthetics for aid in determining the summum bonum" (1903: CP 1.191). Given that Peirce¡¯s esthetics, depicted as the first of his normative sciences, ¡°ought to repose on phenomenology¡± (ibid.: CP 1.191), I offer a communicological analysis (i.e., a phenomenological interpretation of the operative aesthetic sign actions of a semioethic). To accomplish this, I turn to fellow American philosopher and pragmatist John Dewey, whose experiential aesthetics offers insights into Peirce¡¯s claims. Dewey¡¯s understanding of the importance of semiotic ¡°form¡± and existential or embodied ¡°rhythm¡±, when applied to dialogic relations, reveals phenomenological ¡°felt qualities¡± and their reflexive semiotic relation to what I call ¡°embodied intensities¡±. We discover that, when mediated by emotional or energetic interpretants, felt qualities and embodied intensities provide both the necessary and sufficient conditions for a logic of otherness that makes an ethical stance even possible. I contend that our human relationality remains precarious in our global, digitalized environment as long as we disregard or fail to perceive, appreciate, and cultivate this aesthetic phenomenological ground of otherness.