ONLINE FIRST
published on August 2, 2019
Frederick Choo
https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201981126
The Prior Obligations Objection to Theological Stateism
Theological stateist theories, the most well-known of which is Divine Command Theory (DCT), ground our moral obligations directly in some state of God. The prior obligations objection poses a challenge to theological stateism. Is there a moral obligation to obey God¡¯s commands? If no, it is hard to see how God¡¯s commands can generate any moral obligations for us. If yes, then what grounds this prior obligation? To avoid circularity, the moral obligation must be grounded independent of God¡¯s commands; and therefore DCT fails to ground all moral obligations in God¡¯s commands. I argue that DCT proponents should embrace ¡°metaethical DCT.¡± On this view, there is no moral obligation to obey God. God creates our moral obligations out of normative nothingness. I argue that this helps DCT proponents to escape the prior obligations objection. Other theological stateist theories can modify their theory similarly to meet this objection.